emma watson vogue cover uk

images Emma Watson in UK Vogue: I emma watson vogue cover uk. watson vogue cover uk. hot
  • watson vogue cover uk. hot



  • drona
    07-10 01:43 AM
    Several immigration lawyers have also reported on the Flower Campaign on their websites. Matthew Oh reported on his site. So did Bender's Immigration Bulletin. Here is the latest from Greg Siskind's Blog. He shows great support by mentioning Immigration Voice and providing a link to the Flower Campaign.


    http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/





    wallpaper watson vogue cover uk. hot emma watson vogue cover uk. covers emma watson vogue
  • covers emma watson vogue



  • SunnySurya
    08-07 12:09 PM
    No thats not what I am saying. Let me repeat what I am saying and this comes out of the draft I am working with a lawyer
    The interpretation of the intent of the law by USCIS is flawed and should be reconsidered given the enormous backlogs in various categories.

    1. If the people are allowed to move between the categories it will just move the backlog from one line to another penalizing the ones already in that line.
    2. It does not provides an equal opportunity to the people already in that line to move to other category who are patiently waiting for their turn.
    3. The porting is subject to gaming and the people who know how to work the system will be the most benefitted by this.
    4. It will also eleminate any potential for the spill of visa numbers from Eb2 to Eb3 category as Eb2 itself will be backlogged

    It should be noted that the immigration benefits are associated with a job requirements and not a person's qualifications. Changing a GC category should not be allowed except in certain extraordinary circumstances and through appropriate changes in the law.

    Mpadap, your arguments are valid but not pertinent to what I am trying to do. If a person becomes elligible , he/she must be allowed to apply for the positions matching his qualifications. Only thing is that he should not benefit from the portability of PD.

    U are saying - The person's GC category should be same all through out the GC process, irrespective of the technical advancements the person make during the course of the GC process. A person is porting only because he is qualified for the category, U folks are talking as if there is an open slot and everyone is clamoring for it.

    U'r logic should be similar to the below scenario..

    A person joins a company as a Jr. Engineer, then based on U'r logic he/she cannot become a Manager (which requires an MBA / equivalent) because he entered the workforce as a Jr. Engg. Even though the fellow would've acquired necessary skills and even MBA (going part-time to school), still he/she cannot become a Manager. U are vouching that an MBA who joined few months earlier can become the Manager but not the home groomed fellow. Wow, U'r logic seems to a ground breaking thought process, please extrapolate U'r lawsuit for the case mentioned above. If you win, this might be the most ground breaking decision in US.

    Personally I've reported to folks who joined company as high-school grads and worked their way up to Managerial position ofcoz acquiring the necessary college education while working. They have shown up those experience to move ahead of other folks who joined later with higher degrees.

    sunnysurya and rollingflood,
    Rather than focusing on divisive efforts why can't you focus on real problem - retrogression. Why don't you work towards IV's goals? You folks joined the forum few months back and have already made great impact. Hope you would channel U'r energy into something positive for the entire community.





    emma watson vogue cover uk. emma watson vogue cover july.
  • emma watson vogue cover july.



  • SunJoshi
    12-30 03:52 PM
    Starting this thread to discuss bills and proposals for 2006. Open for public.

    The dabate will help formulate strategies.





    2011 covers emma watson vogue emma watson vogue cover uk. Editorial: “Emma Watson#39;s New
  • Editorial: “Emma Watson#39;s New



  • ashshef
    09-24 05:57 PM
    This is not the correct understanding. I know this myth is propogated millions of times in millions of board and so now this myth has become "truth" for millions. But that is not the correct way USCIS does things.

    Country specific limit - 9% does NOT have any realtion to "assigning numbers". it is just meant to "approve 485 - mail you a real physical green card".

    In ROW cataegory other countries are also bound with this 9 (7 + 2) % limit for Visa granting. For an example - For Pakistan USCIS will never grant more than 9% visa per year no matter how many applications from Pakistan have been assigned a valid visa number. Same will go true for Britain or any "other" country.

    In reality How USCIS divide 28.6% among countires - That is unknown mystery and nobody surely know that. And that is why I had to assume "equal shares - 5 part" in my analysis assuming USCIS works fairly but we all know that is a bullshit too :)

    I completely agree with your last 2 lines. But I don't agree with the even dividing of the number into 5 categories of I,P,C,M,ROW.
    Let's take an example. Suppose for some odd coincidence....the first 8000 odd EB3 apps that USCIS processes starting Oct 1.....none are from I,P,C,M. Suppose First 2500 are from Uk, next 2500 from France, next 2500 Germany and the next 508 from Pakistan. Now the number for ROW at this point would be 8008. Now they get another app from UK next. Will they refuse to process that app as the ROW figure had reached? Then they will still process more than 2500 for I,P,C,M. Won't that be unfair to UK applicants.

    As I have said a couple of times now, and so have a few others - ROW cannot be capped at X/5. Due to the high demand from I,P,C,M....it likely gets a MINIMUM of (100 - (7 X 4)) X EB3 cap.



    more...


    emma watson vogue cover uk. girlfriend emma watson vogue
  • girlfriend emma watson vogue



  • trueguy
    08-21 11:44 AM
    There are laws and there are exceptions. Basically there are no Laws when it comes to Immigration. USCIS/DOS can do whatever they like.

    Look at Jul'2007, people with EB3 PD of 2004 got approved and people with 2001 are still waiting.

    Look at EB2 approvals these days. People with 2006 PD are getting approved and people with 2004 PD are still waiting.

    Can somebody explain how PD in each VB goes backward? Is it possible to get new applications with older PD in between? Don't they have computers with all the data where they can see how many applications are pending?

    Howcome they were giving unused numbers to EB3 till last year and how come they changed the interpretation this year. The rule didn't change, they simply changed their interpretation of it.

    If EB3 would have known about this new interpretation then they would have never applied in EB3 category.

    Bottomline is there are no rules. USCIS/DOS is doing whatever they like and playing with our life. Nobody knows how many applications are pending. Nobody can predict the VB movement, it goes forward and backward. We cann't plan our lives and live in limbo all the time.





    emma watson vogue cover uk. Emma Watson Vogue UK December
  • Emma Watson Vogue UK December



  • malaGCPahije
    08-07 04:01 PM
    Is it possible to change category to EB2 with same employer/same job?

    I have the same question as I think, it is not possible. How can you re-apply for the same job you are in currently, in EB2?



    more...


    emma watson vogue cover uk. emma watson vogue cover uk
  • emma watson vogue cover uk



  • mpadapa
    08-07 11:54 AM
    U are saying - The person's GC category should be same all through out the GC process, irrespective of the technical advancements the person make during the course of the GC process. A person is porting only because he is qualified for the category, U folks are talking as if there is an open slot and everyone is clamoring for it.

    U'r logic should be similar to the below scenario..

    A person joins a company as a Jr. Engineer, then based on U'r logic he/she cannot become a Manager (which requires an MBA / equivalent) because he entered the workforce as a Jr. Engg. Even though the fellow would've acquired necessary skills and even MBA (going part-time to school), still he/she cannot become a Manager. U are vouching that an MBA who joined few months earlier can become the Manager but not the home groomed fellow. Wow, U'r logic seems to a ground breaking thought process, please extrapolate U'r lawsuit for the case mentioned above. If you win, this might be the most ground breaking decision in US.

    Personally I've reported to folks who joined company as high-school grads and worked their way up to Managerial position ofcoz acquiring the necessary college education while working. They have shown up those experience to move ahead of other folks who joined later with higher degrees.

    sunnysurya and rollingflood,
    Rather than focusing on divisive efforts why can't you focus on real problem - retrogression. Why don't you work towards IV's goals? You folks joined the forum few months back and have already made great impact. Hope you would channel U'r energy into something positive for the entire community.





    2010 emma watson vogue cover july. emma watson vogue cover uk. Emma Watson in UK Vogue: I
  • Emma Watson in UK Vogue: I



  • Canadian_Dream
    12-06 08:07 PM
    Yes I had one pending and no RFE was received for either. My lawyer is expecting a notification from USCIS stating the second one is withdrawn.

    congratulations! So you had the second I-485 still pending when teh first one got approved? Did you get any RFE about it from USCIS or were you asked to withdraw one of the petitions?



    more...


    emma watson vogue cover uk. Website: www.vogue.co.uk. Emma
  • Website: www.vogue.co.uk. Emma



  • little_willy
    08-20 10:46 PM
    With the earlier method or the current method, EB3-I will always end up last. Vertically EB3-ROW gets the excess visas (old method), horizontally EB2-I gets the excess visas (new method). So, either way EB3-I won't benefit, the only solace being that with the current system atleast our EB2-I friends are getting their freedom faster.

    For us, visa recapture or other legislative changes are the only relief.

    BTW, my PD is June 2003, EB3-I





    hair Editorial: “Emma Watson#39;s New emma watson vogue cover uk. emma watson vogue cover uk.
  • emma watson vogue cover uk.



  • leoindiano
    10-04 12:04 PM
    nov 2004, EB2 I still waiting.

    Texas, biometrics...

    finally got FP notices and the appt. date was october 21st. I did a walk-in to ASC and got it done on sept. 29th. So, the cases will have the way cleared up for oct. 1st. There was an LUD on 30th, may be a result of biometrics uploading. No movement after that.

    both cases are with same IO as per infopass. senators enquiry came back saying wait for 45 to 90 days. Processing in the order we received them.



    more...


    emma watson vogue cover uk. tattoo emma watson vogue cover
  • tattoo emma watson vogue cover



  • indianabacklog
    06-15 04:04 PM
    Does the A# belong to primary applicant or it can be written in Spouse Application too ?
    Should only be put in the primary applicants !485. The spouse will have one on their receipt notice. The fingerprint appointment will use this number as an identifier.





    hot girlfriend emma watson vogue emma watson vogue cover uk. emma watson vogue cover shoot.
  • emma watson vogue cover shoot.



  • onemorecame
    09-14 10:00 AM
    Where is your case now? Any update?

    Hi,

    Any one received any RFE recently on been current on the month of Sep. please share iit. I got my status update with RFE :(


    Thanks
    onemorecame



    more...


    house Re: Emma Watson covers Vogue emma watson vogue cover uk. been a UK Vogue cover girl
  • been a UK Vogue cover girl



  • gc28262
    10-05 02:00 PM
    When I call through vonage phone, the wireless internet connection to other computers is getting lost. Is this the problem others have too?

    Is it having another router in between your vonage phone and cable /DSL connection solve the problem?

    Any thoughts? Has anyone inquired this with vonage folks?

    Vonage won't affect any wireless connections.
    Do you use a cordless phone ?
    The wireless transmission from your cordless phone maybe affecting the transmissions from your wireless router.





    tattoo Emma Watson Vogue UK December emma watson vogue cover uk. UK emma watson vogue cover
  • UK emma watson vogue cover



  • sam_hoosier
    03-25 11:17 AM
    This is a real problem. I got a letter from a prospective employer, who wanted proof that I was legally eligible to work in the US (alongwith transcripts, previous employment letters etc.) prior to scheduling an interview.:cool:

    I believe employers are seeing a lot of candidates on EAD, and for whatever reasons they dont think EAD is good enough and would like to weed those candidates out beforehand.

    We need to fight back against this discrimination.:mad:



    more...


    pictures emma watson vogue cover uk emma watson vogue cover uk. Emma Watson, Vogue
  • Emma Watson, Vogue



  • gc_vbin
    04-05 04:59 PM
    All the IV admin members and coordinators are really busy with the advocacy days at DC.
    You might have to wait for a few more days to be given access.

    I am a subscribed member to IV since last Fri but still can't access the donor forum..somebody help..





    dresses emma watson vogue cover shoot. emma watson vogue cover uk. wallpaper emma watson vogue uk
  • wallpaper emma watson vogue uk



  • shekhar10c
    06-29 06:57 PM
    Could it be that the AILA is talking about the 4th category and AILF's Legal Action Center is seeking plaintiffs - mainly 4th category that got their applications rejected?


    I'm not getting this. If DOS/USCIS wants to retrogress the current dates then why they will wait for july2nd or 3rd. As they know people will file their applications by 29th june or they will try to deliver their applications by 2nd of july. So,if this rumour is really true then they would have posted revised bulletin in this week only , latest by today only, so that people will stop filling applications. So guys relax and keep doing whatever you were doing and file your applications by 2nd july.
    There is nothing in our hands or even in lawyers.Lets wait n watch!!! keep hope



    more...


    makeup Website: www.vogue.co.uk. Emma emma watson vogue cover uk. Re: Emma Watson covers Vogue
  • Re: Emma Watson covers Vogue



  • bharani
    10-31 10:40 AM
    Posted all four letters an hour back.





    girlfriend UK emma watson vogue cover emma watson vogue cover uk. emma watson vogue cover uk.
  • emma watson vogue cover uk.



  • yabadaba
    01-08 03:37 PM
    I will participate in this wholeheartedly. One suggestion to the admin: perhaps we can post this in other websites also like ? I know a lot of people use that site for posting problems etc and whoever is not in IV might also get to know about it.
    gtg-Georgia Tech alumni?





    hairstyles tattoo emma watson vogue cover emma watson vogue cover uk. emma watson vogue cover.
  • emma watson vogue cover.



  • mallu
    09-12 11:17 AM
    Anybody knows the status on item (22) mentioned in http://www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/pr_1186757867585.shtm ?





    appas123
    08-13 07:44 AM
    I have one more question, What should I fill in 1-9 lines? Should I fill with Primary applicant information?
    Fill it with both primary and derivative details. Write in small font with a pen. This will avoid different forms for each applicant.





    guest_mister_08
    08-17 03:17 PM
    I have received Courtesy copy of I485 Approval notice, and law firm received the Original I485 Approval Notice.

    Is there any use for Original I485 Approval Notice or just Green Card is Enough?



    Total Pageviews