Administrator2
03-17 03:28 PM
^^^
Dear rxsimha,
Please start a new thread for your question.
Thanks,
Dear rxsimha,
Please start a new thread for your question.
Thanks,
wallpaper Dolce amp; Gabbana duo: Gomez
sam_hoosier
12-17 10:06 AM
Thank you very much for valuable answer. I appreciate LazyCIS, pmb76 and sam. Then I will wait till 180 days to go.
Just to clarify, Do I need to look / take jobs only permanent after 180 days?
Thank you,
Mani
Take a permanent job which is "same or similar" to the one in the underlying LC.
Just to clarify, Do I need to look / take jobs only permanent after 180 days?
Thank you,
Mani
Take a permanent job which is "same or similar" to the one in the underlying LC.
ivjobs
11-13 03:34 PM
^^
IVStartup - Entrepreneurial group is trying to pool up as much as possible the startup statistics from its members/resources so that this could help IV pitch in with concrete numbers how offering greencard could foster generating new jobs in the bleak economy. EB based applicants not only can deliver the high skilled requirements but do generate employment for americans too through these startups...
IVStartup - Entrepreneurial group is trying to pool up as much as possible the startup statistics from its members/resources so that this could help IV pitch in with concrete numbers how offering greencard could foster generating new jobs in the bleak economy. EB based applicants not only can deliver the high skilled requirements but do generate employment for americans too through these startups...
2011 2011 selena gomez red dress
grupak
06-20 03:54 PM
Make the calls before end of day.
more...
anilsal
10-12 12:02 PM
there was one person who went to the airport to get the I-94 corrected. Wrong date was entered or such.
bombay_masala
05-13 02:19 PM
Dude,
http://www.flcdatacenter.com/CasePerm.aspx
There are MS Access database files for each year.Depending on which year your labor is filed, download the Access db.
For eax, mine was Dec 2002.I downlaoded 2002,03,04.My record was found in 2004 database.
If you open the Access db (You need to have MS Access to view these files.If you dont have it, downlaod the free trail version from microsoft.com)
If you open the file, it is the database of all the Labors that are filed in that year.One of the attribute is the Employee name.You can also search on Attorney name.
If I were you, i would first filter on Employee State and then search for the Employee name.
Its simple.Try it and let me know if you need further help.
Good luck
Hello cool_desi_gc,
I downloaded the access database but could not find employee name in there. Is there any other way to get the labor record? Also I don't have the labor case number to match to this record.
http://www.flcdatacenter.com/CasePerm.aspx
There are MS Access database files for each year.Depending on which year your labor is filed, download the Access db.
For eax, mine was Dec 2002.I downlaoded 2002,03,04.My record was found in 2004 database.
If you open the Access db (You need to have MS Access to view these files.If you dont have it, downlaod the free trail version from microsoft.com)
If you open the file, it is the database of all the Labors that are filed in that year.One of the attribute is the Employee name.You can also search on Attorney name.
If I were you, i would first filter on Employee State and then search for the Employee name.
Its simple.Try it and let me know if you need further help.
Good luck
Hello cool_desi_gc,
I downloaded the access database but could not find employee name in there. Is there any other way to get the labor record? Also I don't have the labor case number to match to this record.
more...
gc_chahiye
12-25 10:03 PM
What's "MTR"
I thought After 180 days of I-485 ,they can not withdraw the I-140 ?
search the forums.. the I-140 can be withdrawn anytime. USCIS is supposed to ignore the denial if its been >180 days of your I-485 filing.
If USCIS does not ignore, then they go ahead and deny the I-485 anyway and that then requries you file a Motion to Reopen (MTR) your case. USCIS makes a mistake, you need to go through hell: while your MTR is being processed (8 months in this case) if you are not on H1 (ie. you used your EAD) then you are out of status and need to stop working immediately. While USCIS works on your MTR you are potentially accruing illegal presence. If it exceeds 180 days, then you better hope your MTR succeeds, otherwise you are now setup for a 3 year re-entry bar into the US. If MTR succeeds, then you are retroactively in status. If it fails, then your out-of-status time begins from the day of your first denial (filing MTR does not give you status).
I thought After 180 days of I-485 ,they can not withdraw the I-140 ?
search the forums.. the I-140 can be withdrawn anytime. USCIS is supposed to ignore the denial if its been >180 days of your I-485 filing.
If USCIS does not ignore, then they go ahead and deny the I-485 anyway and that then requries you file a Motion to Reopen (MTR) your case. USCIS makes a mistake, you need to go through hell: while your MTR is being processed (8 months in this case) if you are not on H1 (ie. you used your EAD) then you are out of status and need to stop working immediately. While USCIS works on your MTR you are potentially accruing illegal presence. If it exceeds 180 days, then you better hope your MTR succeeds, otherwise you are now setup for a 3 year re-entry bar into the US. If MTR succeeds, then you are retroactively in status. If it fails, then your out-of-status time begins from the day of your first denial (filing MTR does not give you status).
2010 selena gomez oscars dress.
dallasmbs
05-22 02:41 PM
But you can bring your spouse by sponsering family based greencard. You dont need to be single forever !
more...
GC08
07-03 07:33 PM
Check this article at:
http://www.wesh.com/money/13616272/detail.html
At the bottom they made the following completely ignorant statement:
"The State Department said the employment visa numbers are no longer available because resources are being used to reduce the backlog of passport applications."
So much for media taking this seriously...
Isn't this a lie? Didn't the release from the State Department say that the reason was sudden backlog reduction efforts from USCIS? Why do they have to lie about this?
They may think that once they mention that they were doing this for the sake of Americans, they could get away with it. NO WAY!
We should let the media, esp. this station, know the truth.
Outrageous! :mad:
http://www.wesh.com/money/13616272/detail.html
At the bottom they made the following completely ignorant statement:
"The State Department said the employment visa numbers are no longer available because resources are being used to reduce the backlog of passport applications."
So much for media taking this seriously...
Isn't this a lie? Didn't the release from the State Department say that the reason was sudden backlog reduction efforts from USCIS? Why do they have to lie about this?
They may think that once they mention that they were doing this for the sake of Americans, they could get away with it. NO WAY!
We should let the media, esp. this station, know the truth.
Outrageous! :mad:
hair selena gomez red dress justin
pappu
08-20 11:43 AM
Due to the economic downturn there aren't many companies sponsoring GCs for employees. I doubt it would be more than 20 to 30k per year from now. This leaves 100-110k visas available every year for retrogressed countries like india and china
if there 300-400k pending GC applications in all categories then shouldn't all of us get our GC in next 3-4 years?
This is wishful thinking. See the data for 2001-2003 when economy was not that good. We still have backlog from those years.
Country limit is EXCLUDED for employment based visa spill over. Read USCIS policy.
Marphad, Do not count on spillovers. Unless you are in EB2. Even in EB2, there will be few years of wait. If you are EB3, forget about gaining much from spillovers. Country caps, recapture, STEM exemption kind of provisions are the only hope. People need to focus on provisions rather than counting numbers, trackers and making excel sheets. It is a waste of valuable time you can use to do something constructive to alleviate the problem.
if there 300-400k pending GC applications in all categories then shouldn't all of us get our GC in next 3-4 years?
This is wishful thinking. See the data for 2001-2003 when economy was not that good. We still have backlog from those years.
Country limit is EXCLUDED for employment based visa spill over. Read USCIS policy.
Marphad, Do not count on spillovers. Unless you are in EB2. Even in EB2, there will be few years of wait. If you are EB3, forget about gaining much from spillovers. Country caps, recapture, STEM exemption kind of provisions are the only hope. People need to focus on provisions rather than counting numbers, trackers and making excel sheets. It is a waste of valuable time you can use to do something constructive to alleviate the problem.
more...
optimystic
02-16 02:57 AM
You should be allocated a visa number if nothing is wrong with your application... If its quite old as it looks to be, they may issue an RFE for EVL.. and you can respond asap and still be optimystic.. Chances are high that you'll get a Visa number assigned to you if the quota doesn't finish in the first week of March... Actual approval can come months later even if the PD has retrogressed...
So chill and prepare for EVL or straight approval...
Name check is irrelevant now.. Its 180 days from when FBI name check was initiated.. Its normally around your Notice Date...
Though my PD is quite old , I didn't get to my I-140 filing until Jan 2007 thanks to the labor certification backlog hell. It was filed premium and approved in Jan 07 itself. And also my I-485 was filed in last week of July. So the information USCIS has is kind of recent. And I have stayed with the same employer so far (One of world's well reputed & largest IT company)
I hope they look at these facts and dont bother sending an RFE or EVL and send me the straight approval ! (Fingers crossed and touch wood and whatever else !)
So chill and prepare for EVL or straight approval...
Name check is irrelevant now.. Its 180 days from when FBI name check was initiated.. Its normally around your Notice Date...
Though my PD is quite old , I didn't get to my I-140 filing until Jan 2007 thanks to the labor certification backlog hell. It was filed premium and approved in Jan 07 itself. And also my I-485 was filed in last week of July. So the information USCIS has is kind of recent. And I have stayed with the same employer so far (One of world's well reputed & largest IT company)
I hope they look at these facts and dont bother sending an RFE or EVL and send me the straight approval ! (Fingers crossed and touch wood and whatever else !)
hot red dress | Selena Gomez
sc3
06-14 08:24 PM
Thanks all for the various responses. However, Immique, what kind of RFE can be expected @ 485 stage?
Also, I have moved to Biz Dev from an engineer after my Labor. I now have my 140 and EAD. Is there any risk because of my change in role?
Get an employment verification letter from your HR, if it says Business Development Dude, and gives your new role as a guy who sells rather and codes, then you have a problem -- that is if USCIS gives you an RFE.
Also, I have moved to Biz Dev from an engineer after my Labor. I now have my 140 and EAD. Is there any risk because of my change in role?
Get an employment verification letter from your HR, if it says Business Development Dude, and gives your new role as a guy who sells rather and codes, then you have a problem -- that is if USCIS gives you an RFE.
more...
house selena gomez vanity fair oscar
cool_desi_gc
04-28 08:41 PM
Dude,
http://www.flcdatacenter.com/CasePerm.aspx
There are MS Access database files for each year.Depending on which year your labor is filed, download the Access db.
For eax, mine was Dec 2002.I downlaoded 2002,03,04.My record was found in 2004 database.
If you open the Access db (You need to have MS Access to view these files.If you dont have it, downlaod the free trail version from microsoft.com)
If you open the file, it is the database of all the Labors that are filed in that year.One of the attribute is the Employee name.You can also search on Attorney name.
If I were you, i would first filter on Employee State and then search for the Employee name.
Its simple.Try it and let me know if you need further help.
Good luck
http://www.flcdatacenter.com/CasePerm.aspx
There are MS Access database files for each year.Depending on which year your labor is filed, download the Access db.
For eax, mine was Dec 2002.I downlaoded 2002,03,04.My record was found in 2004 database.
If you open the Access db (You need to have MS Access to view these files.If you dont have it, downlaod the free trail version from microsoft.com)
If you open the file, it is the database of all the Labors that are filed in that year.One of the attribute is the Employee name.You can also search on Attorney name.
If I were you, i would first filter on Employee State and then search for the Employee name.
Its simple.Try it and let me know if you need further help.
Good luck
tattoo 2011 selena gomez and justin
gcformeornot
01-07 11:32 AM
its a big news. 53000 employees will be under lot of stress in such bad economic time.... its in general bad for reputation of indian firms.
more...
pictures selena gomez oscars 2011
map_boiler
07-12 12:24 PM
Just trying to sum up the situation from USCIS perspective...
1) DOS releases July visa bulletin making all EB categories current (except for other workers)...hoping to force the USCIS to adjudicate cases and avoid wasting visa numbers as in previous years
2) This infuriates USCIS, and for whatever reasons (this has been debated enough already), they decide to use up all the FY2007 visa numbers in June itself and then force the DOS to revise the July bulletin in June itself...so no one can file in July.
3) Unfortunately, they run into issues going through with their plan of using up all visa numbers in June
4) July 1st and morning of July 2nd...they still are working frantically to use up the numbers to avoid new July filers. But by now, it is July already and they have failed in their original mission (see 2 above). Now they start panicking and do some dumb stuff (in violation of their own regulations). They approve I-485's of some folks who were ready for approval (processing complete and FBI check cleared), but whose dates were not current. They also pre-requested some numbers for folks whose dates were current, but processing was not complete i.e. FBI check was not cleared.
5) Late morning July 2nd: By requesting all available numbers from DOS and exhausting FY2007 quota, they forced DOS to revise the July bulletin, which was unprecedented.
6) July 5th and later: It is now post July-2nd, and USCIS still has cases for which they pre-requested numbers. Now the problem is that even if the FBI check comes through for those cases, they cannot approve them because technically, all numbers have been used up for FY 2007. So they start returning numbers to DOS. They also decide NOT the send the applications of people who filed on July 2nd or later back while they decide on the next course of action...
I think this will have major implications for both USCIS and DOS. The key for USCIS was to exhaust visa numbers on or before June 29th to achieve their obejective without repercussions...and force DOS to revise the bulletin in June itself...and they failed miserably at it.
And now they will have to pay. I know some people are thinking please let USCIS just sweep it under the carpet and just allow us to file our cases...no harm done. But I diasgree...what they have done is shameful. And they should be made to pay for playing with our lives. They should never be able to even think of doing something like this again. And their operations should have direct congress/DOS oversight so they cannot get away with snail-paced processing wasting visas ever again...
1) DOS releases July visa bulletin making all EB categories current (except for other workers)...hoping to force the USCIS to adjudicate cases and avoid wasting visa numbers as in previous years
2) This infuriates USCIS, and for whatever reasons (this has been debated enough already), they decide to use up all the FY2007 visa numbers in June itself and then force the DOS to revise the July bulletin in June itself...so no one can file in July.
3) Unfortunately, they run into issues going through with their plan of using up all visa numbers in June
4) July 1st and morning of July 2nd...they still are working frantically to use up the numbers to avoid new July filers. But by now, it is July already and they have failed in their original mission (see 2 above). Now they start panicking and do some dumb stuff (in violation of their own regulations). They approve I-485's of some folks who were ready for approval (processing complete and FBI check cleared), but whose dates were not current. They also pre-requested some numbers for folks whose dates were current, but processing was not complete i.e. FBI check was not cleared.
5) Late morning July 2nd: By requesting all available numbers from DOS and exhausting FY2007 quota, they forced DOS to revise the July bulletin, which was unprecedented.
6) July 5th and later: It is now post July-2nd, and USCIS still has cases for which they pre-requested numbers. Now the problem is that even if the FBI check comes through for those cases, they cannot approve them because technically, all numbers have been used up for FY 2007. So they start returning numbers to DOS. They also decide NOT the send the applications of people who filed on July 2nd or later back while they decide on the next course of action...
I think this will have major implications for both USCIS and DOS. The key for USCIS was to exhaust visa numbers on or before June 29th to achieve their obejective without repercussions...and force DOS to revise the bulletin in June itself...and they failed miserably at it.
And now they will have to pay. I know some people are thinking please let USCIS just sweep it under the carpet and just allow us to file our cases...no harm done. But I diasgree...what they have done is shameful. And they should be made to pay for playing with our lives. They should never be able to even think of doing something like this again. And their operations should have direct congress/DOS oversight so they cannot get away with snail-paced processing wasting visas ever again...
dresses dresses selena gomez red dress
retropain
08-29 12:02 PM
Folks in or around Dallas, TX - this is an opportunity for you to go and attend this hearing
"U.S. Visa Policy: Competition for International Scholars, Scientists and Skilled Workers "
DATE: August 31, 2006
TIME: 09:00 AM
Location: University of Texas at Dallas, The Erik Jonsson School of Engineering & Computer Science, Building ECSS, TI Foundation Auditorium, Richardson, Texas.
Contact: 202-224-5225
http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearing.cfm?id=1801
"U.S. Visa Policy: Competition for International Scholars, Scientists and Skilled Workers "
DATE: August 31, 2006
TIME: 09:00 AM
Location: University of Texas at Dallas, The Erik Jonsson School of Engineering & Computer Science, Building ECSS, TI Foundation Auditorium, Richardson, Texas.
Contact: 202-224-5225
http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearing.cfm?id=1801
more...
makeup Selena Gomez and Justin Bieber
tonyHK12
11-12 01:28 PM
Completely agreee with hari_baby22. Couple of days back I posted that immigration voice could get a lot more donations if they publish there earnings/expenses report online and make everything transparent. Lot of people including myself, do not contribute because they dont know how funds are getting used. My post was deleted by administrator and I got following message -->
Here is the message that has just been posted:
***************
We don't think you are for real. We believe you are an agent of a for profit immigration website.
***************
This time my user account itself might get deleted....
Guys I had posted this yesterday IV is a non-profit. Check the video below - there is nothing to hide:
Immigration Voice funds disclosure on Yahoo! Video (http://video.yahoo.com/watch/234998/1863489)
The fact that IV is helping Donors is because all its activities are only possible because of Donors, and we are still short of funding. If this was for all for free, then no campaign could be acheived.
And believe it or not , we get a lot of spam and rogue users visiting IV.
BTW I am not in IV management
We need you and a lot more to join. I can't believe you cannot trust IV a non-profit organization with even $25
Here is the message that has just been posted:
***************
We don't think you are for real. We believe you are an agent of a for profit immigration website.
***************
This time my user account itself might get deleted....
Guys I had posted this yesterday IV is a non-profit. Check the video below - there is nothing to hide:
Immigration Voice funds disclosure on Yahoo! Video (http://video.yahoo.com/watch/234998/1863489)
The fact that IV is helping Donors is because all its activities are only possible because of Donors, and we are still short of funding. If this was for all for free, then no campaign could be acheived.
And believe it or not , we get a lot of spam and rogue users visiting IV.
BTW I am not in IV management
We need you and a lot more to join. I can't believe you cannot trust IV a non-profit organization with even $25
girlfriend Disney Starlet, Selena Gomez
kumar1
05-27 10:44 AM
Just to add -
If customer is from India/China/Mexico then they will receive the product in 10 years. Rest all can get it in 3/4 years.
If customer uses Master Card (EB-1) then they get it in 6 months, Discover (EB-2) in 1 year. Rest all will wait for a long time.
Their order goes in pending queue, if they do not receive the product within 1 year then they have to renew the order and customer will pay for this renewal.
9 YEARS AND COUNTING.........................
Users comments for the above post that I got. Now, why should I come here for HUMOR.
May be guys down there can give me answer who posted these comments for me.
- > YOU ARE THE COMEDY FOR NOT GETTIN HUMOR, NOW KEEP BURNING LAMP
- > DON'T BE A NERD, LEARN TO LAUGH, US IS ABOUT COMEDY
If customer is from India/China/Mexico then they will receive the product in 10 years. Rest all can get it in 3/4 years.
If customer uses Master Card (EB-1) then they get it in 6 months, Discover (EB-2) in 1 year. Rest all will wait for a long time.
Their order goes in pending queue, if they do not receive the product within 1 year then they have to renew the order and customer will pay for this renewal.
9 YEARS AND COUNTING.........................
Users comments for the above post that I got. Now, why should I come here for HUMOR.
May be guys down there can give me answer who posted these comments for me.
- > YOU ARE THE COMEDY FOR NOT GETTIN HUMOR, NOW KEEP BURNING LAMP
- > DON'T BE A NERD, LEARN TO LAUGH, US IS ABOUT COMEDY
hairstyles selena gomez red dress vanity
punjabi77
09-10 07:09 PM
I know there will be many people who are working on their employer's payroll but keeping maximum share of their rate.
I have my EAD and i want to switch my current company and move to a new
one as my current company is keeping around 20% share.
I am thinking of the following options:
1st option) I have my Canadian PR and thinking of an option to join the current vendor directly. Incase my 485 is rejected, then i can move to Canada.
In this case, i do not know how to run the paycheck and other related stuff to stay out of trouble for my current 485 processing.
2nd Option) I can find an employer who will just keep around 5/hr from my share and keep me on their payroll. I can also keep myself on my H1b by having my H1 transfer done. I will take care of running the payroll from a third party.
In this option i dont have to worry much as company will show me on its payroll and my H1b will be valid.
I would appreciate response from people on this forum. I know someone might be doing it right now.
Please suggest pros/cons of the above options.
I appreciate your response.
I have my EAD and i want to switch my current company and move to a new
one as my current company is keeping around 20% share.
I am thinking of the following options:
1st option) I have my Canadian PR and thinking of an option to join the current vendor directly. Incase my 485 is rejected, then i can move to Canada.
In this case, i do not know how to run the paycheck and other related stuff to stay out of trouble for my current 485 processing.
2nd Option) I can find an employer who will just keep around 5/hr from my share and keep me on their payroll. I can also keep myself on my H1b by having my H1 transfer done. I will take care of running the payroll from a third party.
In this option i dont have to worry much as company will show me on its payroll and my H1b will be valid.
I would appreciate response from people on this forum. I know someone might be doing it right now.
Please suggest pros/cons of the above options.
I appreciate your response.
anandrajesh
02-04 10:03 PM
I went to stamping last october and the VO was very cool. He just wanted to know whether there is EB petition pending onmy name (7th Yr H1B). Didnt bother to ask anything else.
The common thought is they give a hard time to first timers, if you are going for re-stamping they dont bother to ask many questions. You shld be ok, good luck.
The common thought is they give a hard time to first timers, if you are going for re-stamping they dont bother to ask many questions. You shld be ok, good luck.
casinoroyale
03-18 12:15 PM
You should read that RonGothers thread - he is strongly of the opinion that maintaining H1B status while AOS is pending is useless. Moreover, it seems like USCIS can revoke your remaining H1B when they deny AOS application basically kicking you out of the country immediately. Now as a practical matter, I don't think they are doing that anyway. So guys, once you burn up your 6 year H1B, there is no real strong cushion if 485 gets denied. To heck with these laws. Stupid and irritating.
...and the confusion regarding this rule continues :)
...and the confusion regarding this rule continues :)